True Colors: Carolyn Kalil’s Personality Assessment

Calm, happy, complex, practical, spontaneous these are a few ways to describe unrivalleds personality. Everyone has several dissimilar pieces to their personality, almost as a puzzle has many pieces that make up one big picture. Throughout time many individuals have abide by up with their own methods to analyze ones personality. This essay leave behind describe my understanding of Carolyn Kalils True Colors personality opinion and present evidence to support its accuracy. Kalils personality assessment has intravenous feeding possible outcomes. later on winning the assessment one will be ween a color unconsolable, green, gold, or orange.Each color resembles a different personality type. Some examples are calm, curious, organized, and active, respectively. After taking this assessment I found out that my personality is blue, which fits me. I prefer calm, symmetrical relationships, working in groups, helping and nurturing others, along with well though conclusiveness makin g. The assessment asks a series of would you rather style questions. One of the questions, for example, is When in a relationship I (a) prefer my partner to know that I love them without telling them, (b) tell my partner that I love them. After the assessment your results are generated with some information about your color. For best results, one must be truthful when answering the questions. Some people deficiency personality ethic, which is when one pretends to be equalable rather than visual aspecting their unfeigned colors (Lamberton, Minor&, 2010). Lacking personality ethic whitethorn arrest false results, such as how you want to be rather than how you unfeignedly are. I was a little shocked at the accuracy of the results. This pushed me to ray of light deeper to find more information on Kalils strategy.Carolyn Kalils landing field used analysis and interpretation, a common method in creating and valuation surveys. She gathered her information and then assigned meaning to it which helped her to determine conclusions and give her findings significance. Her independent variables were the personality types heeled above. Her depended variables were 1) Feeling, Thinking, Judging, and Perceiving from the MBTI, 2) the General Occupational Themes of Social, Investigative, Conventional, and Realistic from the SII, and 3) the Orientation Scales of Helping, Analyzing, Organizing, Producing, and Adventuring dimensions of the CISS. (Kalil, 1998). orchestration Carolyn Kalil used two instruments when developing her True Colors personality assessment. These instruments were voice cards and words clusters. The character cards consisted of an individual ranking quaternary cards, each of which represents one of the four personality types (Krathwohl, 1998). This test appeals more to the blue and gold personalities. The word clusters required the individual to rank a list of adjectives one a scale of 1 to 4 with 4 being most like the individual and 1 being lea st like them (Krathwohl, 1998).Obviously, this test was self-scored. This test appeals more to the green and orange personalities. Result Kalil operated on the principal of convergent validity. This means that her assessments are related to what they should, in theory, be related to (Lowry, 1990). An example of this would be similarities among test scores. This is because one assumes if youre taking a test then you should have certain knowledge for that subject, resulting in a high test score.Although the subjects for both instruments were male and female, no sexuality differences were found in Kalils studies, (other personality assessments such as the noticeable Interest Inventory or the Campbell Interest Skill and Survey did, however, show strong differences between genders) concluding that gender does not affect personality types (Lowry, 1990). Kalil found that personality types do change over time and may be influenced by outside factors such as the environment in which they a re testing or their current mood (Kalil, 1998).